TXS vs. FFSM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TXS (Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF) and FFSM (Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. TXS is passively managed, while FFSM is actively managed. Over the past year, TXS returned 15.28% vs 39.96% for FFSM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TXS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FFSM.

Performance

TXS vs. FFSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXS achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly lower than FFSM's 22.47% return.

TXS

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 11.72%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 15.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFSM

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 5.51%
• YTD: 22.47%
• 6M: 19.44%
• 1Y: 39.96%
• 3Y*: 22.39%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXS vs. FFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TXS Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF	11.72%	10.31%	24.29%	5.77%
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	22.47%	14.89%	14.38%	7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TXS and FFSM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.85

The correlation between TXS and FFSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TXS vs. FFSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TXS	FFSM
Energy	19.1%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	17.0%	12.2%
Technology	15.1%	14.0%
Industrials	14.6%	29.5%
Real Estate	12.1%	0.0%
Healthcare	9.0%	9.1%
Financial Services	7.0%	22.7%
Communication Services	2.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	2.3%
Utilities	1.7%	1.8%
Basic Materials	0.3%	6.2%

Return for Risk

TXS vs. FFSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXS

TXS Risk / Return Rank: 45
TXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
TXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
TXS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
TXS Martin Ratio Rank: 52

FFSM

FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 78
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXS vs. FFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TXS	FFSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	2.16	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	3.01	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.37	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	3.87	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.92	15.58	-7.66

TXS vs. FFSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the FFSM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXS and FFSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TXS vs. FFSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXS drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum FFSM drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXS and FFSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TXS	FFSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.69%	-26.65%	+6.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.54%	-10.37%	+3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-0.87%	-0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-7.78%	+4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	2.57%	-0.64%

Volatility

TXS vs. FFSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) is 3.14%, while Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that TXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TXS	FFSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	6.37%	-3.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.18%	14.65%	-6.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.71%	18.63%	-6.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	20.76%	-4.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	20.61%	-4.78%

TXS vs. FFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSM's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

TXS vs. FFSM - Dividend Comparison

TXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than FFSM's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.43%	0.56%	0.62%	0.56%	0.58%	0.37%
TXS Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF	0.75%	0.82%	0.86%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TXS and FFSM in my portfolio?

TXS and FFSM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TXS or FFSM?

FFSM has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to TXS (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXS dropped -19.69% vs FFSM's -26.65%.

Which ETF is better, TXS or FFSM?

On 1-year performance, FFSM leads with 39.96% vs 15.28% for TXS. On fees, FFSM is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, TXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TXS or FFSM?

Over the 1-year period, FFSM has performed better with a 39.96% return vs 15.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TXS or FFSM?

FFSM is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for TXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TXS or FFSM?

TXS has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

What is the main difference between TXS and FFSM?

They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TXS and 0.43% for FFSM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.