TXN vs. GFS
TXN (Texas Instruments Incorporated) and GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, TXN returned 23.02%/yr vs 9.16%/yr for GFS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TXN vs. GFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TXN achieves a 69.63% return, which is significantly lower than GFS's 121.39% return.
TXN
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 69.63%
- 6M
- 62.64%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 23.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- 19.97%
GFS
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 121.39%
- 6M
- 93.66%
- 1Y
- 104.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TXN vs. GFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 69.63% | -4.47% | 13.14% | 6.41% | -9.86% | 0.94% |
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 121.39% | -18.62% | -29.19% | 12.45% | -17.05% | 40.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXN and GFS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between TXN and GFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TXN:
$265.88B
GFS:
$43.37B
TXN:
$5.88
GFS:
$1.39
TXN:
49.50
GFS:
55.60
TXN:
14.41
GFS:
6.32
TXN:
15.85
GFS:
3.71
TXN:
$18.44B
GFS:
$6.84B
TXN:
$10.57B
GFS:
$1.81B
TXN:
$8.21B
GFS:
$2.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXN vs. GFS — Risk / Return Rank
TXN
GFS
TXN vs. GFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TXN | GFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 4.38 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 8.48 | -4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TXN | GFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.97 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.23 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
TXN vs. GFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXN drawdown since its inception was -85.81%, which is greater than GFS's maximum drawdown of -61.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXN and GFS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXN | GFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.81% | -61.53% | -24.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.57% | -24.10% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.41% | -55.40% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.46% | -14.06% | +3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -34.60% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.11% | 12.41% | +1.70% |
Volatility
TXN vs. GFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is 13.93%, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a volatility of 26.13%. This indicates that TXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXN | GFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.93% | 26.13% | -12.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.98% | 44.75% | -13.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.96% | 53.66% | -13.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 51.15% | -18.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.13% | 51.15% | -20.02% |
Dividends
TXN vs. GFS - Dividend Comparison
TXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, while GFS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1.93% | 3.17% | 2.81% | 2.94% | 2.84% | 2.23% | 2.27% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.03% | 2.25% | 2.55% |
Financials
TXN vs. GFS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Instruments Incorporated and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TXN vs. GFS - Profitability Comparison
TXN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 4.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.
GFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
TXN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.81B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.
GFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.
TXN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in a net margin of 32.0%.
GFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TXN and GFS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFS has higher volatility (26.13%) compared to TXN (13.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXN dropped -85.81% vs GFS's -61.53%.
GFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TXN and GFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer