PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWSMX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWSMX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWSMX achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 8.81% return.


TWSMX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.11%
YTD
6.03%
6M
5.56%
1Y
15.39%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
8.59%

FRGAX

1D
0.89%
1M
1.27%
YTD
8.81%
6M
8.63%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWSMX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TWSMX
American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund
6.03%13.67%10.52%13.10%-0.31%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
8.81%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TWSMX and FRGAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022

0.96

The correlation between TWSMX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWSMX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWSMX
TWSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TWSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TWSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWSMX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWSMXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.06

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

13.32

-3.86

TWSMX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWSMX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWSMX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWSMX drawdown since its inception was -37.90%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWSMX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWSMXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.90%

-11.77%

-26.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-7.03%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-11.77%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.51%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-1.58%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.61%

0.00%

Volatility

TWSMX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund (TWSMX) is 3.32%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that TWSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWSMXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.91%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

7.94%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.99%

9.60%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.02%

10.41%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.44%

10.41%

+1.03%

TWSMX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWSMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWSMX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

TWSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than FRGAX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.84%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TWSMX
American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund
6.99%6.88%5.80%2.08%5.54%10.75%5.09%14.25%12.25%11.03%2.14%7.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TWSMX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRGAX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to TWSMX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWSMX dropped -37.90% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWSMX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer