BGEIX vs. GDXJ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BGEIX (American Century Global Gold Fund) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds. Over the past 10 years, BGEIX returned 12.88%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for GDXJ. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGEIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.

Performance

BGEIX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGEIX achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BGEIX has outperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 12.88%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.51% annualized return.

BGEIX

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -3.15%
• YTD: -3.68%
• 6M: -7.64%
• 1Y: 59.00%
• 3Y*: 42.03%
• 5Y*: 20.76%
• 10Y*: 12.88%

GDXJ

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -6.73%
• 6M: -11.57%
• 1Y: 61.56%
• 3Y*: 47.15%
• 5Y*: 19.28%
• 10Y*: 11.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGEIX vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGEIX American Century Global Gold Fund	-3.68%	158.45%	15.10%	7.52%	-12.54%	-8.85%	18.92%	37.82%	-7.43%	10.62%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	-6.73%	172.28%	15.67%	7.12%	-14.53%	-21.25%	30.40%	40.44%	-11.02%	8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BGEIX and GDXJ is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2009	0.94

The correlation between BGEIX and GDXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BGEIX vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGEIX

BGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 21
BGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

GDXJ

GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 32
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGEIX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGEIX	GDXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.19	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.63	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.22	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	1.57	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	4.14	+0.19

BGEIX vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGEIX and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGEIX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGEIX drawdown since its inception was -78.69%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGEIX and GDXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGEIX	GDXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.69%	-88.66%	+9.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.12%	-39.47%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.12%	-39.47%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.62%	-48.79%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.92%	-57.77%	+5.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.07%	-32.06%	+3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.14%	-60.41%	+25.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.13%	14.91%	-1.78%

Volatility

BGEIX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) is 16.29%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 19.55%. This indicates that BGEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGEIX	GDXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.29%	19.55%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.40%	44.13%	-6.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.44%	52.24%	-7.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.03%	41.64%	-7.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.49%	44.30%	-10.81%

BGEIX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGEIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGEIX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

BGEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than GDXJ's 2.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGEIX American Century Global Gold Fund	1.17%	0.85%	1.36%	1.56%	1.38%	2.13%	0.56%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	10.56%	0.00%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	2.50%	2.33%	2.61%	0.72%	0.51%	1.78%	1.58%	0.39%	0.45%	0.03%	4.78%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGEIX and GDXJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, BGEIX and GDXJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BGEIX or GDXJ?

GDXJ has higher volatility (19.55%) compared to BGEIX (16.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGEIX dropped -78.69% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.