TVAL vs. FDL
TVAL (T. Rowe Price Value ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. TVAL is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TVAL returned 19.63%/yr vs 19.10%/yr for FDL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TVAL charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
TVAL vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TVAL achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 12.67% return.
TVAL
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 17.15%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- 29.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 22.39%
- 3Y*
- 19.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
TVAL vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TVAL T. Rowe Price Value ETF | 17.15% | 15.59% | 14.54% | 8.45% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 12.67% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 8.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TVAL and FDL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TVAL and FDL has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TVAL vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TVAL
FDL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
TVAL
FDL
Financial Services
TVAL
FDL
Industrials
TVAL
FDL
Healthcare
TVAL
FDL
Communication Services
TVAL
FDL
Energy
TVAL
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
TVAL
FDL
Consumer Defensive
TVAL
FDL
Utilities
TVAL
FDL
Basic Materials
TVAL
FDL
Real Estate
TVAL
FDL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TVAL vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
TVAL
FDL
TVAL vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TVAL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.34 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 5.26 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.29 | 12.40 | +4.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TVAL vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TVAL drawdown since its inception was -14.84%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TVAL and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TVAL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.84% | -65.93% | +51.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -4.27% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.84% | -12.24% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -3.09% | +2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -9.64% | +7.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.81% | -0.10% |
Volatility
TVAL vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) have volatilities of 3.62% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TVAL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 3.72% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | 8.09% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.98% | 11.54% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 14.31% | -1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 17.11% | -4.50% |
TVAL vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TVAL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
TVAL vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
TVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FDL's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.70% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
TVAL T. Rowe Price Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.15% | 1.16% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TVAL and FDL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDL has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to TVAL (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TVAL dropped -14.84% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 3-year performance, TVAL leads with 19.63% vs 19.10% for FDL. On fees, TVAL is cheaper at 0.33% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TVAL has performed better with a 19.63% return vs 19.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TVAL is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.98% for TVAL.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for TVAL and 0.43% for FDL.
TVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TVAL and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer