TUSA vs. LST
TUSA (First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF) and LST (Leuthold Select Industries ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. TUSA is passively managed, while LST is actively managed. Over the past year, TUSA returned 18.40% vs 34.83% for LST. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TUSA charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LST.
Performance
TUSA vs. LST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than LST's 16.81% return.
TUSA
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
LST
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 34.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUSA vs. LST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 6.54% | 8.90% |
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF | 16.81% | 15.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUSA and LST is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025 | 0.60 |
The correlation between TUSA and LST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUSA vs. LST — Risk / Return Rank
TUSA
LST
TUSA vs. LST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUSA | LST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 2.44 | -1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 3.42 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 3.23 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 13.38 | -5.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUSA | LST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.44 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.38 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
TUSA vs. LST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than LST's maximum drawdown of -19.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and LST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUSA | LST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -19.47% | -37.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -10.85% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.46% | -0.18% | -4.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -2.92% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.61% | -0.17% |
Volatility
TUSA vs. LST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) is 3.48%, while Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that TUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUSA | LST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 4.11% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 11.72% | -2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.92% | 14.33% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 17.93% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 17.93% | +2.21% |
TUSA vs. LST - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LST's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUSA vs. LST - Dividend Comparison
TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than LST's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF | 1.15% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 1.66% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUSA and LST have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LST has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to TUSA (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs LST's -19.47%.
On 1-year performance, LST leads with 34.83% vs 18.40% for TUSA. On fees, LST is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LST has performed better with a 34.83% return vs 18.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LST is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.
TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.15% for LST.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Leuthold Group. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.65% for LST.
LST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUSA and LST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer