LST vs. FLDZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LST (Leuthold Select Industries ETF) and FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LST returned 33.41% vs 9.37% for FLDZ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LST charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FLDZ.

Performance

LST vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LST achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly higher than FLDZ's 5.89% return.

LST

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 15.69%
• 6M: 14.16%
• 1Y: 33.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLDZ

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 5.89%
• 6M: 4.45%
• 1Y: 9.37%
• 3Y*: 13.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LST vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF	15.69%	15.31%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	5.89%	2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LST and FLDZ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2025	0.78

The correlation between LST and FLDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LST vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LST

LST Risk / Return Rank: 70
LST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
LST Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
LST Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LST Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LST Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 26
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LST vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LST	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	0.82	+1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	1.25	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.15	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	1.51	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.63	4.56	+8.07

LST vs. FLDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LST Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the FLDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LST and FLDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LST vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LST drawdown since its inception was -19.47%, roughly equal to the maximum FLDZ drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LST and FLDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LST	FLDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.47%	-19.54%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.85%	-6.25%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-1.06%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-5.92%	+3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	2.06%	+0.59%

Volatility

LST vs. FLDZ - Volatility Comparison

Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) at 2.83%. This indicates that LST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LST	FLDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	2.83%	+2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.37%	7.84%	+4.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.94%	11.44%	+3.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.01%	16.86%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	16.86%	+1.15%

LST vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LST has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

LST vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison

LST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than FLDZ's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.45%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF	1.16%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LST and FLDZ in my portfolio?

LST and FLDZ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LST or FLDZ?

LST has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to FLDZ (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LST dropped -19.47% vs FLDZ's -19.54%.

Which ETF is better, LST or FLDZ?

On 1-year performance, LST leads with 33.41% vs 9.37% for FLDZ. On fees, LST is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FLDZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LST or FLDZ?

Over the 1-year period, LST has performed better with a 33.41% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LST or FLDZ?

LST is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LST or FLDZ?

FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.16% for LST.

What is the main difference between LST and FLDZ?

They also come from different issuers: Leuthold Group and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LST and 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.