PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSA vs. LSAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSA vs. LSAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than LSAF's 12.02% return.


TUSA

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
7.49%
6M
7.70%
1Y
20.76%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
10.85%

LSAF

1D
-1.01%
1M
1.86%
YTD
12.02%
6M
12.26%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSA vs. LSAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
7.49%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-17.33%
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
12.02%12.01%18.09%15.48%-13.12%22.75%6.92%28.35%-15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and LSAF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.78

The correlation between TUSA and LSAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

TUSA vs. LSAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUSA
LSAF

Financial Services

31.9%
17.2%

Industrials

19.8%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
22.5%

Basic Materials

14.1%
3.1%

Utilities

7.5%
0.9%

Technology

6.1%
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
7.3%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.2%

Healthcare

2.0%
9.3%

Communication Services

2.0%
1.0%

Energy

1.9%
5.6%

Financial Services

TUSA
31.9%
LSAF
17.2%

Industrials

TUSA
19.8%
LSAF
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TUSA
16.0%
LSAF
22.5%

Basic Materials

TUSA
14.1%
LSAF
3.1%

Utilities

TUSA
7.5%
LSAF
0.9%

Technology

TUSA
6.1%
LSAF
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

TUSA
4.1%
LSAF
7.3%

Real Estate

TUSA
2.1%
LSAF
2.2%

Healthcare

TUSA
2.0%
LSAF
9.3%

Communication Services

TUSA
2.0%
LSAF
1.0%

Energy

TUSA
1.9%
LSAF
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSA vs. LSAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

LSAF
LSAF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LSAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSAF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LSAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSAF Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSA vs. LSAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUSALSAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.65

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

11.92

-3.46

TUSA vs. LSAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the LSAF Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and LSAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUSALSAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.66

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.53

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.47

-0.15

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. LSAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than LSAF's maximum drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and LSAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSALSAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-41.67%

-14.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-6.58%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-20.26%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-24.94%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-1.01%

-2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-6.32%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.01%

+0.45%

Volatility

TUSA vs. LSAF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) is 3.53%, while LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that TUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSALSAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.80%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

10.33%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

14.44%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.39%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

21.87%

-1.73%

TUSA vs. LSAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUSA vs. LSAF - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than LSAF's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
0.61%0.69%0.42%0.84%0.96%0.37%0.53%0.71%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.64%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSA and LSAF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSAF has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to TUSA (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs LSAF's -41.67%.

On 5-year performance, LSAF leads with 9.74% vs 6.51% for TUSA. On fees, TUSA is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LSAF has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 6.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TUSA is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LSAF.

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.61% for LSAF.

TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while LSAF tracks AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.75% for LSAF.

LSAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSA and LSAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer