PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSA vs. GRPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSA vs. GRPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than GRPM's 7.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TUSA having a 10.75% annualized return and GRPM not far ahead at 10.99%.


TUSA

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.72%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
10.75%

GRPM

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.30%
YTD
7.11%
6M
6.51%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSA vs. GRPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
6.54%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
7.11%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and GRPM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010

0.70

The correlation between TUSA and GRPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TUSA vs. GRPM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUSA
GRPM

Financial Services

31.9%
29.9%

Industrials

19.8%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
9.7%

Basic Materials

14.1%

-

Utilities

7.5%

-

Technology

6.1%
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.8%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Healthcare

2.0%
12.3%

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Energy

1.9%
15.8%

Financial Services

TUSA
31.9%
GRPM
29.9%

Industrials

TUSA
19.8%
GRPM
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TUSA
16.0%
GRPM
9.7%

Basic Materials

TUSA
14.1%
GRPM

-

Utilities

TUSA
7.5%
GRPM

-

Technology

TUSA
6.1%
GRPM
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

TUSA
4.1%
GRPM
5.8%

Real Estate

TUSA
2.1%
GRPM

-

Healthcare

TUSA
2.0%
GRPM
12.3%

Communication Services

TUSA
2.0%
GRPM

-

Energy

TUSA
1.9%
GRPM
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSA vs. GRPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

GRPM
GRPM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GRPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSA vs. GRPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUSAGRPMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.37

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

2.04

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.89

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.56

8.54

-0.98

TUSA vs. GRPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the GRPM Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and GRPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUSAGRPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.37

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.37

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.50

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.55

-0.23

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. GRPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than GRPM's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and GRPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSAGRPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-43.12%

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-7.62%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-28.09%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-28.09%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-43.12%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-0.11%

-4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-5.71%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.57%

-0.13%

Volatility

TUSA vs. GRPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) is 3.48%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that TUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSAGRPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.82%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

10.44%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

16.13%

-3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

20.90%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

22.25%

-2.11%

TUSA vs. GRPM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GRPM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUSA vs. GRPM - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than GRPM's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
0.96%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.66%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSA and GRPM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRPM has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to TUSA (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs GRPM's -43.12%.

On 10-year performance, GRPM leads with 10.99% vs 10.75% for TUSA. On fees, GRPM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRPM has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRPM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.96% for GRPM.

TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.35% for GRPM.

TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSA and GRPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer