PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GRPM vs. FDVLX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GRPMFDVLX
YTD Return25.98%16.78%
1Y Return43.92%34.67%
3Y Return (Ann)8.99%8.22%
5Y Return (Ann)15.01%14.39%
10Y Return (Ann)10.67%10.38%
Sharpe Ratio2.392.22
Sortino Ratio3.363.13
Omega Ratio1.401.38
Calmar Ratio4.171.44
Martin Ratio10.8712.16
Ulcer Index4.27%2.99%
Daily Std Dev19.40%16.41%
Max Drawdown-43.12%-93.13%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between GRPM and FDVLX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

GRPM vs. FDVLX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 25.98% return, which is significantly higher than FDVLX's 16.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GRPM having a 10.67% annualized return and FDVLX not far behind at 10.38%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.30%
8.47%
GRPM
FDVLX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRPM vs. FDVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVLX's 0.79% expense ratio.


FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
Expense ratio chart for FDVLX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for GRPM: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRPM vs. FDVLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRPM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GRPM, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GRPM, currently valued at 3.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GRPM, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GRPM, currently valued at 4.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GRPM, currently valued at 10.87, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.87
FDVLX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDVLX, currently valued at 2.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDVLX, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.13
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FDVLX, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDVLX, currently valued at 4.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FDVLX, currently valued at 12.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.16

GRPM vs. FDVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPM Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FDVLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPM and FDVLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.39
2.22
GRPM
FDVLX

Dividends

GRPM vs. FDVLX - Dividend Comparison

GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than FDVLX's 0.89% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
0.86%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%1.28%1.80%
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
0.89%1.04%0.70%1.37%0.98%1.15%1.39%1.36%1.23%12.17%2.94%1.83%

Drawdowns

GRPM vs. FDVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum FDVLX drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and FDVLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
GRPM
FDVLX

Volatility

GRPM vs. FDVLX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) at 4.78%. This indicates that GRPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.24%
4.78%
GRPM
FDVLX