TUSA vs. FLDZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TUSA (First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF) and FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. TUSA is passively managed, while FLDZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUSA returned 16.04%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for FLDZ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TUSA charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FLDZ.

Performance

TUSA vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than FLDZ's 4.32% return.

TUSA

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 6M: 6.72%
• 1Y: 18.40%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: 6.32%
• 10Y*: 10.75%

FLDZ

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 4.32%
• 6M: 3.13%
• 1Y: 8.06%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSA vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF	6.54%	13.64%	11.12%	11.75%	-13.31%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	4.32%	6.66%	15.99%	12.15%	-11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and FLDZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022	0.87

The correlation between TUSA and FLDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

TUSA vs. FLDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TUSA	FLDZ
Financial Services	31.9%	15.1%
Industrials	19.8%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	16.0%	14.8%
Basic Materials	14.1%	1.6%
Utilities	7.5%	11.9%
Technology	6.1%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	4.8%
Real Estate	2.1%	8.3%
Healthcare	2.0%	11.7%
Communication Services	2.0%	4.6%
Energy	1.9%	11.5%

Return for Risk

TUSA vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSA

TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 45
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSA vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TUSA	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	0.72	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	1.10	+1.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.13	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	1.30	+1.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.56	3.94	+3.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TUSA vs. FLDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the FLDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and FLDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TUSA	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	0.72	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.34	-0.02

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than FLDZ's maximum drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and FLDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUSA	FLDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.53%	-19.54%	-36.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.57%	-6.25%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.04%	-17.43%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.46%	-1.72%	-2.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.87%	-5.98%	-3.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.05%	+0.39%

Volatility

TUSA vs. FLDZ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) at 2.57%. This indicates that TUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUSA	FLDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	2.57%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	7.63%	+1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.92%	11.31%	+1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.65%	16.91%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.14%	16.91%	+3.23%

TUSA vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUSA vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than FLDZ's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.48%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF	1.66%	1.59%	2.05%	2.15%	2.31%	0.72%	0.99%	1.13%	1.14%	0.79%	1.24%	0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUSA and FLDZ in my portfolio?

TUSA and FLDZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TUSA or FLDZ?

TUSA has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to FLDZ (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs FLDZ's -19.54%.

Which ETF is better, TUSA or FLDZ?

On 3-year performance, TUSA leads with 16.04% vs 13.19% for FLDZ. On fees, TUSA is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FLDZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUSA or FLDZ?

Over the 3-year period, TUSA has performed better with a 16.04% return vs 13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUSA or FLDZ?

TUSA is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUSA or FLDZ?

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.48% for FLDZ.

What is the main difference between TUSA and FLDZ?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.