TUR vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

TUR (iShares MSCI Turkey ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUR is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TUR returned 13.98%/yr vs 16.65%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

TUR vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUR achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 86.43% return.

TUR

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -11.46%
• YTD: 12.06%
• 6M: 13.21%
• 1Y: 25.17%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 13.98%
• 10Y*: 2.67%

FLKR

• 1D: 6.28%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 86.43%
• 6M: 95.63%
• 1Y: 177.77%
• 3Y*: 43.23%
• 5Y*: 16.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUR vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TUR iShares MSCI Turkey ETF	12.06%	-1.54%	12.91%	-8.83%	105.75%	-27.41%	-1.19%	14.49%	-41.46%	1.50%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	86.43%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TUR and FLKR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.30

The correlation between TUR and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TUR vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TUR	FLKR
Industrials	32.0%	12.8%
Financial Services	22.0%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	11.4%	1.5%
Basic Materials	9.8%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	6.0%
Energy	5.9%	0.4%
Real Estate	4.1%	-
Utilities	3.5%	0.3%
Communication Services	3.2%	1.6%
Healthcare	1.8%	2.5%
Technology	0.8%	64.3%

Return for Risk

TUR vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUR

TUR Risk / Return Rank: 32
TUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
TUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
TUR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
TUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TUR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 94
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUR vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TUR	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	4.03	-3.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	3.85	-2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.57	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	7.77	-6.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	27.92	-23.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TUR vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUR Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUR and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TUR	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	4.03	-3.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.57	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.47	-0.44

Drawdowns

TUR vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUR drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUR and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUR	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.34%	-50.06%	-22.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.07%	-23.03%	+6.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.63%	-26.39%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.63%	-49.51%	+17.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.48%	-14.59%	-14.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.89%	-22.06%	-17.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.51%	6.40%	-0.89%

Volatility

TUR vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) is 14.02%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 26.26%. This indicates that TUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUR	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.02%	26.26%	-12.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.10%	40.64%	-20.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.46%	44.43%	-18.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.18%	29.12%	+5.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.41%	28.11%	+6.30%

TUR vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUR vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

TUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than FLKR's 2.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.07%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
TUR iShares MSCI Turkey ETF	2.14%	2.40%	1.79%	4.43%	1.97%	4.22%	0.87%	3.29%	4.05%	2.64%	2.89%	3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUR and FLKR in my portfolio?

TUR and FLKR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TUR or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (26.26%) compared to TUR (14.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUR dropped -72.34% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, TUR or FLKR?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 16.65% vs 13.98% for TUR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, TUR has been the lower-risk option at 14.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUR or FLKR?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 16.65% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUR or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TUR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUR or FLKR?

TUR has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 2.07% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between TUR and FLKR?

TUR is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. TUR tracks MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TUR and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.