TUGN vs. TUG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) and TUG (STF Tactical Growth ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from STF. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUGN returned 22.84%/yr vs 23.61%/yr for TUG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

TUGN vs. TUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a 19.35% return, which is significantly lower than TUG's 20.36% return.

TUGN

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 11.07%
• YTD: 19.35%
• 6M: 17.92%
• 1Y: 36.99%
• 3Y*: 22.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TUG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 11.01%
• YTD: 20.36%
• 6M: 19.04%
• 1Y: 40.10%
• 3Y*: 23.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUGN vs. TUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	19.35%	19.11%	18.44%	34.84%	-18.78%
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	20.36%	20.43%	19.37%	38.24%	-12.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and TUG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022	0.93

The correlation between TUGN and TUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

TUGN vs. TUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TUGN	TUG
Technology	53.8%	54.6%
Communication Services	15.6%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	12.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	7.4%
Healthcare	4.3%	4.1%
Industrials	3.2%	3.0%
Utilities	1.3%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.2%	1.1%
Energy	0.7%	0.7%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

TUGN vs. TUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUGN

TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 66
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 57

TUG

TUG Risk / Return Rank: 70
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUGN vs. TUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TUGN	TUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.49	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.27	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.42	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	3.27	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.00	12.47	-2.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TUGN vs. TUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUGN Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the TUG Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUGN and TUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TUGN	TUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.49	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	1.12	-0.15

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. TUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than TUG's maximum drawdown of -22.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and TUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUGN	TUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-22.27%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.96%	-12.31%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.60%	-22.27%	+0.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.48%	+0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-4.31%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	3.22%	+0.49%

Volatility

TUGN vs. TUG - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) at 4.30%. This indicates that TUGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUGN	TUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	4.30%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	12.23%	-0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	16.16%	-0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	18.02%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	18.02%	-0.99%

TUGN vs. TUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TUGN and TUG have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

TUGN vs. TUG - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, more than TUG's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	1.43%	1.75%	4.97%	1.34%	1.14%
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	10.50%	11.50%	11.84%	10.83%	7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUGN and TUG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, TUGN and TUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TUGN or TUG?

TUGN has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to TUG (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUGN dropped -23.45% vs TUG's -22.27%.

Which ETF is better, TUGN or TUG?

On 3-year performance, TUG leads with 23.61% vs 22.84% for TUGN. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, TUG has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUGN or TUG?

Over the 3-year period, TUG has performed better with a 23.61% return vs 22.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUGN or TUG?

TUGN and TUG have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUGN or TUG?

TUGN has the higher dividend yield at 10.50%, compared with 1.43% for TUG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.