TUA vs. UTWO
TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and UTWO (US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify, while UTWO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. TUA is actively managed, while UTWO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUA returned -0.75%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for UTWO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TUA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UTWO.
Performance
TUA vs. UTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUA achieves a -5.01% return, which is significantly lower than UTWO's 0.37% return.
TUA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- -5.01%
- 6M
- -4.73%
- 1Y
- -1.63%
- 3Y*
- -0.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTWO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUA vs. UTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -5.01% | 7.27% | -3.59% | -2.04% | -0.81% |
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 0.37% | 4.79% | 3.71% | 3.45% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUA and UTWO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between TUA and UTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUA vs. UTWO — Risk / Return Rank
TUA
UTWO
TUA vs. UTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUA | UTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | 2.33 | -2.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | 3.84 | -4.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.47 | -0.51 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 3.38 | -3.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 12.53 | -13.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUA | UTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 2.33 | -2.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 1.45 | -1.58 |
Drawdowns
TUA vs. UTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUA drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, which is greater than UTWO's maximum drawdown of -2.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUA and UTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUA | UTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -2.04% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -0.90% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.14% | -1.08% | -8.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.70% | -0.34% | -9.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -0.49% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 0.24% | +2.26% |
Volatility
TUA vs. UTWO - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) at 0.37%. This indicates that TUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUA | UTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 0.37% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.85% | 0.92% | +3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.86% | 1.35% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 2.07% | +8.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 2.07% | +8.69% |
TUA vs. UTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than UTWO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TUA vs. UTWO - Dividend Comparison
TUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than UTWO's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.54% | 3.84% | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.15% |
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 3.49% | 3.63% | 4.22% | 4.39% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, TUA and UTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TUA has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to UTWO (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUA dropped -15.85% vs UTWO's -2.04%.
On 3-year performance, UTWO leads with 3.80% vs -0.75% for TUA. On fees, UTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UTWO has performed better with a 3.80% return vs -0.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for TUA.
TUA has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.49% for UTWO.
TUA is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while UTWO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and US Benchmark Series. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TUA and 0.15% for UTWO.
UTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUA and UTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer