PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTWO vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTWO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTWO achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.69% return.


UTWO

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
0.14%
1M
5.40%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.09%
1Y
29.62%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTWO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UTWO
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
0.37%4.79%3.71%3.45%-0.81%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.72%24.89%26.18%-6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between UTWO and SPY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTWO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTWO
UTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
UTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTWO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTWOSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.52

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.84

3.42

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.42

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.53

15.93

-3.40

UTWO vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTWO and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTWOSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.52

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

0.59

+0.87

Drawdowns

UTWO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTWO drawdown since its inception was -2.04%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWO and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTWOSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-55.19%

+53.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-8.88%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.08%

-18.76%

+17.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

0.00%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-9.05%

+8.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

1.91%

-1.67%

Volatility

UTWO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) is 0.37%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that UTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTWOSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

2.75%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

8.89%

-7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35%

11.81%

-10.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.07%

17.05%

-14.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

17.94%

-15.87%

UTWO vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTWO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

UTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.97%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
UTWO
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
3.49%3.63%4.22%4.39%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTWO and SPY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to UTWO (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWO dropped -2.04% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 3-year performance, SPY leads with 22.64% vs 3.80% for UTWO. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, UTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPY has performed better with a 22.64% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTWO.

UTWO has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.97% for SPY.

UTWO is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPY is S&P 500. UTWO tracks ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWO and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTWO and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer