TUA vs. RINF
TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify, while RINF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. TUA is actively managed, while RINF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUA returned 0.67%/yr vs 3.98%/yr for RINF. Their -0.36 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TUA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RINF.
Performance
TUA vs. RINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUA achieves a -6.37% return, which is significantly lower than RINF's 3.18% return.
TUA
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -6.37%
- 1Y
- -5.24%
- 3Y*
- 0.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.64%
RINF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $118.15K | $123.66K | $133.91K | |
| $11.89M | $10.24M | $8.33M |
TUA vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -6.37% | 7.27% | -3.59% | -2.04% | -0.83% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.18% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | -4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUA and RINF is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUA vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank
TUA
RINF
TUA vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TUA | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.15 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 1.64 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 4.07 | -4.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TUA vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUA drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUA and RINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUA | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -43.51% | +27.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.96% | -2.29% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.14% | -9.62% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.99% | 0.00% | -10.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.45% | -16.28% | +7.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 0.93% | +2.71% |
Volatility
TUA vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) at 1.48%. This indicates that TUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUA | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 1.48% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.57% | 3.13% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.01% | 4.33% | +2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.65% | 12.51% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.65% | 12.54% | -1.89% |
TUA vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUA vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison
TUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than RINF's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.63% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.12% | 3.84% | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUA and RINF have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUA has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to RINF (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUA dropped -15.85% vs RINF's -43.51%.
On 3-year performance, RINF leads with 3.98% vs 0.67% for TUA. On fees, TUA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, RINF has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RINF has performed better with a 3.98% return vs 0.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TUA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
RINF has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 3.12% for TUA.
TUA is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while RINF is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TUA and 0.30% for RINF.
RINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUA and RINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer