TUA vs. BIL
TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. TUA is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUA returned -0.88%/yr vs 4.64%/yr for BIL. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
TUA vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUA achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.49% return.
TUA
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- -5.38%
- 6M
- -5.28%
- 1Y
- -1.78%
- 3Y*
- -0.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
TUA vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -5.38% | 7.27% | -3.59% | -2.04% | -0.81% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.49% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUA and BIL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022 | 0.03 |
The correlation between TUA and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUA vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
TUA
BIL
TUA vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -174.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 87.91 | -86.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 355.35 | -355.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 2,817.77 | -2,818.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 19.71 | -19.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 13.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 2.78 | -2.91 |
Drawdowns
TUA vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUA drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUA and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -0.78% | -15.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -0.01% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.14% | -0.01% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.05% | 0.00% | -10.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -0.26% | -8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 0.00% | +2.53% |
Volatility
TUA vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that TUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 0.05% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.84% | 0.13% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.85% | 0.20% | +6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 0.26% | +10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 0.26% | +10.50% |
TUA vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TUA vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
TUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.56% | 3.84% | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUA and BIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUA has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUA dropped -15.85% vs BIL's -0.78%.
On 3-year performance, BIL leads with 4.64% vs -0.88% for TUA. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BIL has performed better with a 4.64% return vs -0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for TUA.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 3.56% for TUA.
TUA is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TUA and 0.14% for BIL.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUA and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer