PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTT vs. IIGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTT vs. IIGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTT achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than IIGD's 0.25% return.


TTT

1D
1.04%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
3.59%
6M
10.09%
1Y
-6.82%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
-1.20%

IIGD

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.49%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTT vs. IIGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
3.59%-7.89%38.07%-11.25%150.17%2.55%-54.12%-34.88%-7.21%
IIGD
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
0.25%7.11%3.90%5.71%-7.27%-1.42%6.30%7.40%0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TTT and IIGD is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

-0.63

The correlation between TTT and IIGD shifts across timeframes, from -0.76 (3 years) to -0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TTT vs. IIGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TTT
IIGD

Financial Services

62.5%
16.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

5.5%

Healthcare

-

5.5%

Industrials

-

11.6%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Technology

-

8.7%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Financial Services

TTT
62.5%
IIGD
16.7%

Basic Materials

TTT

-

IIGD
1.8%

Communication Services

TTT

-

IIGD
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TTT

-

IIGD
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

TTT

-

IIGD
5.6%

Energy

TTT

-

IIGD
5.5%

Healthcare

TTT

-

IIGD
5.5%

Industrials

TTT

-

IIGD
11.6%

Real Estate

TTT

-

IIGD
3.0%

Technology

TTT

-

IIGD
8.7%

Utilities

TTT

-

IIGD
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTT vs. IIGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTT
TTT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

IIGD
IIGD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IIGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIGD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IIGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIGD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTT vs. IIGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTTIIGDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

1.81

-2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.13

2.75

-2.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.34

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

2.49

-2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.58

8.72

-9.30

TTT vs. IIGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTT Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the IIGD Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTT and IIGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTTIIGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

1.81

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.45

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.77

-1.00

Drawdowns

TTT vs. IIGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTT drawdown since its inception was -94.00%, which is greater than IIGD's maximum drawdown of -11.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTT and IIGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTTIIGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.00%

-11.43%

-82.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.18%

-1.67%

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.69%

-2.14%

-47.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.69%

-11.43%

-38.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.28%

-0.80%

-77.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.36%

-2.42%

-67.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.13%

0.47%

+11.66%

Volatility

TTT vs. IIGD - Volatility Comparison

UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) at 0.75%. This indicates that TTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTTIIGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.69%

0.75%

+7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.48%

1.65%

+17.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.26%

2.29%

+26.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.18%

3.66%

+43.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.38%

3.70%

+39.68%

TTT vs. IIGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IIGD's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTT vs. IIGD - Dividend Comparison

TTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, more than IIGD's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IIGD
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
4.28%4.25%4.13%3.74%1.73%1.77%3.21%2.44%1.23%
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
9.34%9.87%4.86%12.15%0.34%0.00%0.29%1.88%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTT and IIGD have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTT has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to IIGD (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTT dropped -94.00% vs IIGD's -11.43%.

On 5-year performance, TTT leads with 17.30% vs 1.63% for IIGD. On fees, IIGD is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IIGD has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TTT has performed better with a 17.30% return vs 1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IIGD is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TTT.

TTT has the higher dividend yield at 9.34%, compared with 4.28% for IIGD.

TTT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while IIGD is Corporate Bonds. TTT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%), while IIGD tracks Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TTT and 0.13% for IIGD.

IIGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTT and IIGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer