TTT vs. TBF
Compare and contrast key facts about UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF).
TTT and TBF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TTT is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%). It was launched on Mar 27, 2012. TBF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index (-100%). It was launched on Aug 20, 2009. Both TTT and TBF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TTT or TBF.
Key characteristics
| TTT | TBF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.99% | 11.30% |
| 1Y Return | 50.17% | 20.30% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 30.98% | 13.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.11% | 3.72% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -9.78% | -0.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.09 | 1.29 |
| Daily Std Dev | 49.55% | 16.63% |
| Max Drawdown | -94.00% | -70.40% |
| Current Drawdown | -77.68% | -47.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTT and TBF is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TTT vs. TBF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TTT achieves a 30.99% return, which is significantly higher than TBF's 11.30% return. Over the past 10 years, TTT has underperformed TBF with an annualized return of -9.78%, while TBF has yielded a comparatively higher -0.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TTT vs. TBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TBF's 0.94% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TTT vs. TBF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TTT vs. TBF - Dividend Comparison
TTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, more than TBF's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 11.46% | 15.39% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 1.88% | 0.44% |
TBF ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury | 4.38% | 4.99% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 1.68% | 0.88% |
Drawdowns
TTT vs. TBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTT drawdown since its inception was -94.00%, which is greater than TBF's maximum drawdown of -70.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTT and TBF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TTT vs. TBF - Volatility Comparison
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) at 4.09%. This indicates that TTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.