PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTE vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTE vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TotalEnergies SE (TTE) and Unilever PLC (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTE achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -3.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TTE has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 16.01%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.


TTE

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.73%
6M
24.83%
YTD
26.42%
1Y
38.26%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
23.58%
10Y*
16.01%
ALL TIME*
6.71%

UL

1D
-0.63%
1M
6.16%
6M
-2.23%
YTD
-3.56%
1Y
-4.56%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
5.17%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTE vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
26.42%31.96%-11.58%10.48%37.55%56.52%-9.98%15.41%-2.56%12.42%
UL
Unilever PLC
-3.56%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TTE and UL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.11

The correlation between TTE and UL shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTE:

$179.94B

UL:

$133.56B

EPS

TTE:

$6.88

UL:

€5.38

PE Ratio

TTE:

11.75

UL:

10.07

PEG Ratio

TTE:

9.97

UL:

1.97

PS Ratio

TTE:

0.96

UL:

1.09

PB Ratio

TTE:

1.42

UL:

7.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTE:

$183.34B

UL:

€109.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTE:

$61.59B

UL:

€90.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTE:

$37.85B

UL:

€24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTE vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTE
TTE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTE vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TotalEnergies SE (TTE) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTEULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.98

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

-0.18

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

-0.35

+7.20

TTE vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTE and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTE vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTE drawdown since its inception was -62.81%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTE and UL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTEULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.81%

-53.55%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.08%

-25.09%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.51%

-25.09%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.95%

-25.09%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.81%

-30.13%

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.58%

-15.44%

+2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.93%

-10.62%

-8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

13.20%

-7.60%

Volatility

TTE vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

TotalEnergies SE (TTE) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Unilever PLC (UL) at 6.50%. This indicates that TTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTEULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

6.50%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.79%

17.27%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.89%

22.22%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.26%

21.04%

+14.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.49%

21.52%

+15.97%

Dividends

TTE vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

TTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than UL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
4.87%9.64%9.09%4.60%8.41%27.22%10.10%6.52%4.07%4.51%4.77%5.46%
UL
Unilever PLC
3.68%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

TTE vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TotalEnergies SE and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
48.90B
18.38B
(TTE) Total Revenue
(UL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TTE values in USD, UL values in EUR

TTE vs. UL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TotalEnergies SE and Unilever PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
20.5%
0
Portfolio components
TTE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a gross profit of 10.03B and revenue of 48.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.5%.

UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TTE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported an operating income of 10.03B and revenue of 48.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

TTE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a net income of 5.74B and revenue of 48.90B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTE and UL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTE has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to UL (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTE dropped -62.81% vs UL's -53.55%.

TTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTE and UL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer