PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTDU vs. TSLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -77.55% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -3.24% return.


TTDU

1D
-5.44%
1M
-31.38%
YTD
-77.55%
6M
-78.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLZ

1D
2.59%
1M
-16.87%
YTD
-3.24%
6M
-3.97%
1Y
-65.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
-77.55%-37.11%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
-3.24%-25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TTDU and TSLZ is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTDU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTDU

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTDUTSLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

-0.67

-0.20

Drawdowns

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -89.89%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and TSLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTDUTSLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.89%

-99.11%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.89%

-98.98%

+9.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.22%

-75.39%

+16.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.77%

Volatility

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTDUTSLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.88%

91.68%

+16.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.88%

116.96%

-9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.88%

116.96%

-9.08%

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

TTDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.71%0.69%2.08%12.15%
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTDU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for TTDU.

TTDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 1.05% for TSLZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTDU and TSLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer