PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTDU vs. TSLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -83.89% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's 45.39% return.


TTDU

1D
-2.82%
1M
-13.40%
6M
-73.54%
YTD
-83.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

TSLZ

1D
-1.43%
1M
44.35%
6M
37.89%
YTD
45.39%
1Y
-48.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-71.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.89M$35.72M$42.79M
$2.72M$3.16M$3.26M

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
-83.89%-36.72%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
45.39%-26.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TTDU and TSLZ is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTDU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TTDU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTDUTSLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -93.63%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and TSLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTDUTSLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.63%

-99.11%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.74%

-98.47%

+5.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.91%

-76.60%

+11.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.63%

Volatility

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTDUTSLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.88%

91.79%

+13.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.88%

117.68%

-12.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.88%

117.68%

-12.80%

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTDU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

TTDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.47%0.69%2.08%12.15%
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTDU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for TTDU.

TTDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 1.05% for TSLZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTDU and TSLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer