PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTDU vs. RBLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTDU vs. RBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TTDU having a -77.55% return and RBLU slightly lower at -79.08%.


TTDU

1D
-5.44%
1M
-31.38%
YTD
-77.55%
6M
-78.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBLU

1D
-6.23%
1M
-20.33%
YTD
-79.08%
6M
-84.26%
1Y
-86.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTDU vs. RBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
-77.55%-37.11%
RBLU
T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF
-79.08%-69.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TTDU and RBLU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTDU vs. RBLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTDU

RBLU
RBLU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
RBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTDU vs. RBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TTDU vs. RBLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTDURBLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

-0.58

-0.29

Drawdowns

TTDU vs. RBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -89.89%, roughly equal to the maximum RBLU drawdown of -94.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and RBLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTDURBLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.89%

-94.59%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.89%

-94.16%

+4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.22%

-42.88%

-16.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.69%

Volatility

TTDU vs. RBLU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTDURBLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

99.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.88%

119.35%

-11.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.88%

117.21%

-9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.88%

117.21%

-9.33%

TTDU vs. RBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBLU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTDU vs. RBLU - Dividend Comparison

TTDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTDU and RBLU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBLU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBLU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.

RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.19%, compared with 0.00% for TTDU.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 1.05% for RBLU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTDU and RBLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer