TTDU vs. QTAP
TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TTDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
TTDU vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -77.55% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 14.67% return.
TTDU
- 1D
- -5.44%
- 1M
- -31.38%
- YTD
- -77.55%
- 6M
- -78.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
TTDU vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -77.55% | -37.11% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.67% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTDU and QTAP is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTDU vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
TTDU
QTAP
TTDU vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTDU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.87 | 0.75 | -1.62 |
Drawdowns
TTDU vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -89.89%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTDU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.89% | -29.44% | -60.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.89% | -0.10% | -89.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.22% | -5.04% | -54.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility
TTDU vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTDU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.88% | 5.56% | +102.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.88% | 18.89% | +88.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.88% | 18.77% | +89.11% |
TTDU vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTDU vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTDU nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTDU and QTAP have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.
TTDU and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for TTDU and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer