TTDU vs. PYPG
TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) and PYPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TTDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PYPG.
Performance
TTDU vs. PYPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -82.55% return, which is significantly lower than PYPG's -23.77% return.
TTDU
- 1D
- -5.72%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- 6M
- -79.80%
- YTD
- -82.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYPG
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 73.22%
- 6M
- -19.05%
- YTD
- -23.77%
- 1Y
- -57.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTDU vs. PYPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -82.55% | -36.72% |
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | -23.77% | -28.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTDU and PYPG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTDU vs. PYPG — Risk / Return Rank
TTDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PYPG
TTDU vs. PYPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTDU | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTDU vs. PYPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -92.95%, which is greater than PYPG's maximum drawdown of -79.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and PYPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTDU | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.95% | -79.52% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -79.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.14% | -61.90% | -30.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.58% | -41.38% | -22.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 56.44% | — |
Volatility
TTDU vs. PYPG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTDU | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 34.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 77.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.86% | 85.36% | +19.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.86% | 83.15% | +21.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.86% | 83.15% | +21.71% |
TTDU vs. PYPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PYPG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTDU vs. PYPG - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTDU nor PYPG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTDU and PYPG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PYPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PYPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.
TTDU and PYPG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 0.75% for PYPG.
Find the right allocation for TTDU and PYPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer