PYPG vs. BRKW
PYPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PYPG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYPG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.
Performance
PYPG vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPG achieves a -54.04% return, which is significantly lower than BRKW's -6.96% return.
PYPG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -16.19%
- YTD
- -54.04%
- 6M
- -59.26%
- 1Y
- -74.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKW
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- -6.96%
- 6M
- -7.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYPG vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | -54.04% | -36.32% |
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | -6.96% | 2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPG and BRKW is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPG vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank
PYPG
BRKW
PYPG vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYPG | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYPG | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | -0.30 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
PYPG vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPG drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPG and BRKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPG | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.52% | -12.64% | -66.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.03% | -9.92% | -67.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.13% | -5.36% | -32.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.39% | — | — |
Volatility
PYPG vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPG | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.89% | 17.22% | +60.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.39% | 17.22% | +61.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.39% | 17.22% | +61.17% |
PYPG vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYPG vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison
PYPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | 24.97% | 14.45% |
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPG and BRKW have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PYPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PYPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.
BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 24.97%, compared with 0.00% for PYPG.
PYPG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PYPG and 0.99% for BRKW.
Find the right allocation for PYPG and BRKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer