PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTC vs. MNST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTC vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Toro Company (TTC) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TTC having a 16.03% return and MNST slightly higher at 16.13%. Over the past 10 years, TTC has underperformed MNST with an annualized return of 9.00%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.


TTC

1D
1.20%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
16.03%
6M
28.87%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
-2.05%
5Y*
-1.35%
10Y*
9.00%

MNST

1D
0.91%
1M
18.40%
YTD
16.13%
6M
20.35%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
13.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTC vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTC
The Toro Company
16.03%0.34%-15.16%-13.97%14.88%6.48%20.66%44.40%-13.13%17.90%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
16.13%45.87%-8.77%13.48%5.72%3.85%45.52%29.11%-22.23%42.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TTC and MNST is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

0.21

The correlation between TTC and MNST shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTC:

$8.94B

MNST:

$87.99B

EPS

TTC:

$3.36

MNST:

$2.06

PE Ratio

TTC:

27.08

MNST:

43.21

PS Ratio

TTC:

1.97

MNST:

9.98

PB Ratio

TTC:

6.30

MNST:

10.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTC:

$4.55B

MNST:

$8.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTC:

$1.51B

MNST:

$4.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTC:

$547.80M

MNST:

$2.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTC vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTC
TTC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MNST
MNST Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNST Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNST Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTC vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Toro Company (TTC) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTCMNSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.49

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

2.36

-0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.30

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.22

-1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.95

6.31

-3.36

TTC vs. MNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTC Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTC and MNST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTCMNSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.49

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.54

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.51

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.60

-0.11

Drawdowns

TTC vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTC drawdown since its inception was -66.48%, roughly equal to the maximum MNST drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTC and MNST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTCMNSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.48%

-69.17%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-17.70%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.65%

-26.04%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.32%

-26.62%

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.32%

-30.42%

-12.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.21%

-0.22%

-16.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.28%

-20.68%

+5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

6.25%

+1.01%

Volatility

TTC vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Toro Company (TTC) is 5.77%, while Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) has a volatility of 13.66%. This indicates that TTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTCMNSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

13.66%

-7.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.75%

19.99%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.26%

26.34%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.36%

24.59%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.38%

26.25%

+0.13%

Dividends

TTC vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

TTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TTC
The Toro Company
1.69%1.94%1.82%1.44%1.10%1.09%1.07%1.16%1.48%1.11%1.12%1.44%

Financials

TTC vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Toro Company and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.04B
2.35B
(TTC) Total Revenue
(MNST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TTC vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Toro Company and Monster Beverage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
32.5%
55.0%
Portfolio components
TTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Toro Company reported a gross profit of 336.50M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

MNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

TTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Toro Company reported an operating income of 87.10M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

MNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

TTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Toro Company reported a net income of 67.90M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

MNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTC and MNST have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNST has higher volatility (13.66%) compared to TTC (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTC dropped -66.48% vs MNST's -69.17%.

MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTC and MNST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer