TTAC vs. VV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. TTAC is actively managed, while VV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAC returned 12.83%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for VV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TTAC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.

Performance

TTAC vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly higher than VV's 11.16% return.

TTAC

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 17.95%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 20.65%
• 3Y*: 19.14%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: —

VV

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 6M: 10.98%
• 1Y: 28.29%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: 13.64%
• 10Y*: 15.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTAC vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF	17.95%	8.07%	18.26%	22.97%	-14.60%	30.66%	18.30%	26.03%	-6.26%	15.23%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	11.16%	18.11%	25.25%	27.18%	-19.91%	27.41%	21.04%	31.25%	-4.46%	10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAC and VV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017	0.92

The correlation between TTAC and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TTAC vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TTAC	VV
Technology	29.5%	35.9%
Financial Services	14.5%	11.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	9.8%
Healthcare	11.9%	8.6%
Industrials	9.0%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	4.8%
Communication Services	6.1%	11.2%
Energy	2.6%	3.6%
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.6%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.7%
Utilities	-	2.7%

Return for Risk

TTAC vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAC

TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 45
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 36
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

VV

VV Risk / Return Rank: 71
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAC vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TTAC	VV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	2.37	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	3.24	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.43	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	3.09	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.37	14.11	-4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TTAC vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAC and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TTAC	VV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	2.37	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.80	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.60	+0.19

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and VV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTAC	VV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.95%	-54.81%	+19.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-9.21%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.92%	-18.97%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.88%	-25.66%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.30%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-6.84%	+1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	2.01%	+0.20%

Volatility

TTAC vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.79%. This indicates that TTAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTAC	VV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	2.79%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	8.99%	+2.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.31%	11.99%	+3.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.09%	17.22%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	18.19%	+0.52%

TTAC vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTAC vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than VV's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF	0.53%	0.62%	0.70%	0.94%	1.36%	9.63%	0.41%	0.72%	0.62%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	0.97%	1.08%	1.24%	1.41%	1.66%	1.19%	1.46%	1.81%	2.09%	1.75%	1.98%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTAC and VV in my portfolio?

TTAC and VV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TTAC or VV?

TTAC has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to VV (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAC dropped -34.95% vs VV's -54.81%.

Which ETF is better, TTAC or VV?

On 5-year performance, VV leads with 13.64% vs 12.83% for TTAC. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TTAC or VV?

Over the 5-year period, VV has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TTAC or VV?

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TTAC or VV?

VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.

What is the main difference between TTAC and VV?

They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.04% for VV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.