PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TTAC vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TTAC vs. DGRO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTAC is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by TrimTabs, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. TTAC is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAC returned 11.12%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for DGRO. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TTAC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

TTAC vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 13.79% return.

TTAC

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.36%
6M
12.42%
YTD
15.31%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
14.10%

DGRO

1D
0.35%
1M
1.32%
6M
9.21%
YTD
13.79%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.38%
ALL TIME*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
$107.57M$103.25M$110.55M

TTAC

TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
$1.01M$1.13M$1.15M

TTAC vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF		15.31%8.07%18.26%22.97%-14.60%30.66%18.30%26.03%-6.26%15.11%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF		13.79%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAC and DGRO is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between TTAC and DGRO has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TTAC vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TTAC
DGRO

Technology

31.4%
17.3%

Financial Services

14.5%
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
6.5%

Healthcare

11.6%
17.9%

Industrials

9.3%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
11.9%

Communication Services

5.0%
0.1%

Energy

2.6%
4.8%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Utilities

-

7.3%

Technology

TTAC
31.4%
DGRO
17.3%

Financial Services

TTAC
14.5%
DGRO
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TTAC
11.8%
DGRO
6.5%

Healthcare

TTAC
11.6%
DGRO
17.9%

Industrials

TTAC
9.3%
DGRO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

TTAC
8.0%
DGRO
11.9%

Communication Services

TTAC
5.0%
DGRO
0.1%

Energy

TTAC
2.6%
DGRO
4.8%

Basic Materials

TTAC
2.3%
DGRO
2.5%

Real Estate

TTAC
2.0%
DGRO

-

Utilities

TTAC

-

DGRO
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

Often compared with TTAC:
TTAC vs. COWGTTAC vs. SPYTTAC vs. DSTLTTAC vs. COWZTTAC vs. VFLOTTAC vs. VIGTTAC vs. BDGS
Often compared with DGRO:
DGRO vs. SCHDDGRO vs. VIGDGRO vs. VYMDGRO vs. VOODGRO vs. DGRWDGRO vs. DIVODGRO vs. HDV

Return for Risk

TTAC vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
TTAC
TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTAC vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TTACDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.24
2.60

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.76
3.77

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.48

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.83

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

14.91

-6.00

TTAC vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAC and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and DGRO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TTACDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-35.10%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-6.47%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-14.03%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-19.31%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.10%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.50%

-1.01%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-3.41%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.66%

+0.67%

Volatility

TTAC vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.88%. This indicates that TTAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TTACDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

2.88%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

7.12%

+6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.82%

9.54%

+7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

13.79%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

16.58%

+2.17%

TTAC vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTAC vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than DGRO's 1.89% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF		1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF		0.54%0.62%0.70%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TTAC and DGRO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTAC has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to DGRO (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAC dropped -34.95% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 11.15% vs 11.12% for TTAC. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 11.15% return vs 11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.54% for TTAC.

TTAC is categorized as Quality Factor, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTAC and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer