PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTAC vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTAC vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 17.63% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.


TTAC

1D
0.02%
1M
6.04%
YTD
17.63%
6M
17.18%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTAC vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
17.63%8.07%18.26%22.97%-14.60%30.66%18.30%12.19%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAC and BBUS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.93

The correlation between TTAC and BBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TTAC vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TTAC
BBUS

Technology

29.5%
37.1%

Financial Services

14.5%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
9.4%

Healthcare

11.9%
8.1%

Industrials

9.0%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
4.5%

Communication Services

6.1%
10.8%

Energy

2.6%
3.2%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.7%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Technology

TTAC
29.5%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

TTAC
14.5%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TTAC
12.7%
BBUS
9.4%

Healthcare

TTAC
11.9%
BBUS
8.1%

Industrials

TTAC
9.0%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

TTAC
8.0%
BBUS
4.5%

Communication Services

TTAC
6.1%
BBUS
10.8%

Energy

TTAC
2.6%
BBUS
3.2%

Basic Materials

TTAC
2.3%
BBUS
1.2%

Real Estate

TTAC
2.0%
BBUS
1.7%

Utilities

TTAC

-

BBUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTAC vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAC
TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAC vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTACBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.00

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

13.76

-4.35

TTAC vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAC and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTACBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.33

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.79

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTACBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-35.35%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-9.21%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-19.01%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-25.46%

+3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-5.46%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.00%

+0.21%

Volatility

TTAC vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that TTAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTACBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

2.88%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

8.96%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

11.87%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

17.03%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

19.59%

-0.88%

TTAC vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTAC vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.53%0.62%0.70%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTAC and BBUS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTAC has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAC dropped -34.95% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 12.77% for TTAC. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.

They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTAC and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer