PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTAC vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TTAC vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TTAC vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
-0.10%8.07%18.26%22.97%-14.60%30.66%24.40%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
2.39%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 2.39% return.


TTAC

1D
3.03%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*

ALTL

1D
0.37%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
2.39%
6M
4.18%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TTAC vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TTAC vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAC
TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAC vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTACALTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.49

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.98

2.03

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.28

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

2.98

-1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.45

10.34

-5.90

TTAC vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAC and ALTL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTACALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.49

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.18

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.62

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between TTAC and ALTL is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TTAC vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than ALTL's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.63%0.62%0.70%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
1.07%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than ALTL's maximum drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and ALTL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TTACALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-31.91%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-9.79%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-31.91%

+10.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-5.43%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-11.85%

+6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.82%

-0.07%

Volatility

TTAC vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) at 2.97%. This indicates that TTAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TTACALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

2.97%

+3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

13.20%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.81%

18.61%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

18.23%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.77%

20.11%

-1.34%