PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TT vs. OKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TT vs. OKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trane Technologies plc (TT) and ONEOK, Inc. (OKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TT having a 22.45% return and OKE slightly higher at 22.91%. Over the past 10 years, TT has outperformed OKE with an annualized return of 24.34%, while OKE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.42% annualized return.


TT

1D
-3.51%
1M
5.41%
YTD
22.45%
6M
21.03%
1Y
12.14%
3Y*
38.02%
5Y*
22.96%
10Y*
24.34%

OKE

1D
2.05%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
22.91%
6M
22.97%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
21.22%
5Y*
15.73%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TT vs. OKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TT
Trane Technologies plc
22.45%6.38%52.97%47.39%-15.34%41.02%11.26%48.32%4.41%21.27%
OKE
ONEOK, Inc.
22.91%-22.94%50.10%13.21%18.86%64.67%-43.45%47.76%6.27%-2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TT and OKE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between TT and OKE has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TT:

$105.83B

OKE:

$55.62B

EPS

TT:

$12.94

OKE:

$5.61

PE Ratio

TT:

36.67

OKE:

15.70

PEG Ratio

TT:

1.67

OKE:

1.11

PS Ratio

TT:

4.92

OKE:

1.58

PB Ratio

TT:

12.29

OKE:

2.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

TT:

$21.60B

OKE:

$35.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TT:

$7.76B

OKE:

$8.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

TT:

$4.25B

OKE:

$7.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TT vs. OKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TT
TT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

OKE
OKE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
OKE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
OKE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TT vs. OKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and ONEOK, Inc. (OKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTOKEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.12

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

0.79

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

1.79

-0.59

TT vs. OKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TT Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the OKE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TT and OKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TT vs. OKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.91%, roughly equal to the maximum OKE drawdown of -80.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and OKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTOKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.91%

-80.17%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.97%

-20.76%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.44%

-42.17%

+17.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.53%

-42.17%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.13%

-80.17%

+29.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-18.76%

+15.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-16.67%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.13%

9.14%

+0.99%

Volatility

TT vs. OKE - Volatility Comparison

Trane Technologies plc (TT) and ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) have volatilities of 9.26% and 9.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTOKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.26%

9.51%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.93%

20.87%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.99%

26.28%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.40%

28.22%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.35%

38.91%

-10.56%

Dividends

TT vs. OKE - Dividend Comparison

TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than OKE's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OKE
ONEOK, Inc.
4.77%5.61%3.94%5.44%5.69%6.36%9.74%4.66%6.01%5.09%4.28%9.85%
TT
Trane Technologies plc
0.84%0.97%0.91%1.23%1.59%1.17%1.46%1.59%2.15%1.91%1.81%2.10%

Financials

TT vs. OKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trane Technologies plc and ONEOK, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
4.97B
9.62B
(TT) Total Revenue
(OKE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TT vs. OKE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trane Technologies plc and ONEOK, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
34.8%
26.7%
Portfolio components
TT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

OKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ONEOK, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.57B and revenue of 9.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.

TT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

OKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ONEOK, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.43B and revenue of 9.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

TT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

OKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ONEOK, Inc. reported a net income of 774.00M and revenue of 9.62B, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TT and OKE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OKE has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to TT (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TT dropped -77.91% vs OKE's -80.17%.

OKE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TT and OKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer