TSYY vs. TQQY
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and TQQY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TQQY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -12.29% vs 19.85% for TQQY. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TQQY.
Performance
TSYY vs. TQQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -16.60% return, which is significantly lower than TQQY's 8.28% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQY
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 8.28%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY vs. TQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | -8.87% |
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF | 8.28% | -5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and TQQY is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025 | 0.62 |
The correlation between TSYY and TQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. TQQY — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
TQQY
TSYY vs. TQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSYY | TQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.20 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 1.03 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 2.53 | -3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSYY | TQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 0.95 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.09 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. TQQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than TQQY's maximum drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and TQQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | TQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -25.31% | -16.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.31% | -19.35% | -7.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.69% | -3.27% | -33.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -9.63% | -16.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.49% | 7.87% | +6.62% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. TQQY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) at 1.90%. This indicates that TSYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | TQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 1.90% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 14.80% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.77% | 20.92% | +10.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 23.91% | +13.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 23.91% | +13.61% |
TSYY vs. TQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. TQQY - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 282.79%, more than TQQY's 59.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF | 59.51% | 49.61% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and TQQY have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to TQQY (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs TQQY's -25.31%.
On 1-year performance, TQQY leads with 19.85% vs -12.29% for TSYY. On fees, TSYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TQQY has performed better with a 19.85% return vs -12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 59.51% for TQQY.
TSYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TQQY is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYY and 1.07% for TQQY.
TQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and TQQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer