PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQY vs. YMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQY vs. YMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TQQY having a 8.16% return and YMAX slightly lower at 7.89%.


TQQY

1D
0.03%
1M
5.45%
YTD
8.16%
6M
6.33%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YMAX

1D
-0.68%
1M
8.60%
YTD
7.89%
6M
6.51%
1Y
12.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQY vs. YMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TQQY and YMAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

0.71

The correlation between TQQY and YMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQY vs. YMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQY
TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQY vs. YMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQYYMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

0.56

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

0.88

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.11

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

0.49

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.78

1.17

+1.60

TQQY vs. YMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the YMAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQY and YMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQYYMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

0.56

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.73

-0.65

Drawdowns

TQQY vs. YMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, roughly equal to the maximum YMAX drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and YMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQYYMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.31%

-26.13%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.35%

-26.13%

+6.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-4.35%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-6.33%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.87%

10.99%

-3.12%

Volatility

TQQY vs. YMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) is 1.89%, while YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that TQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQYYMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

5.86%

-3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

17.03%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.93%

21.56%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.95%

22.96%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.95%

22.96%

+0.99%

TQQY vs. YMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQY vs. YMAX - Dividend Comparison

TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.58%, less than YMAX's 69.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
TQQY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
59.58%49.61%0.00%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
69.87%78.70%44.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQQY and YMAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YMAX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to TQQY (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -25.31% vs YMAX's -26.13%.

On 1-year performance, TQQY leads with 20.68% vs 12.05% for YMAX. On fees, TQQY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TQQY has performed better with a 20.68% return vs 12.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 69.87%, compared with 59.58% for TQQY.

TQQY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YMAX is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 1.28% for YMAX.

TQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQY and YMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer