TSYY vs. QYLD
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. TSYY is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -12.29% vs 23.93% for QYLD. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
TSYY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -16.60% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
TSYY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | -15.96% | -0.18% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and QYLD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TSYY and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
QYLD
TSYY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSYY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.63 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 4.84 | -5.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 28.36 | -29.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSYY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 2.80 | -3.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.59 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -24.75% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.31% | -4.97% | -22.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.69% | -0.06% | -36.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -3.84% | -22.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.49% | 0.85% | +13.64% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that TSYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 1.85% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 7.12% | +12.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.77% | 8.58% | +23.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 14.70% | +22.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 15.49% | +22.03% |
TSYY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 282.79%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 23.93% vs -12.29% for TSYY. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 23.93% return vs -12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.
TSYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYY and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer