TSYY vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -12.29% vs 30.41% for QQQI. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

TSYY vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -16.60% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.43% return.

TSYY

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: -16.60%
• 6M: -16.47%
• 1Y: -12.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 6.91%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 12.92%
• 1Y: 30.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSYY vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF	-16.60%	-15.96%	-0.18%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.43%	18.62%	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TSYY and QQQI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.59

The correlation between TSYY and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSYY vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSYY

TSYY Risk / Return Rank: 5
TSYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TSYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TSYY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TSYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
TSYY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSYY vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSYY	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	2.35	-2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.33	3.12	-3.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.43	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	3.18	-3.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	14.27	-15.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSYY vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSYY and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSYY	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39	2.35	-2.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.59	1.34	-1.92

Drawdowns

TSYY vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSYY	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.52%	-20.00%	-21.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.31%	-9.61%	-17.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.69%	-0.17%	-36.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.88%	-2.20%	-23.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.49%	2.14%	+12.35%

Volatility

TSYY vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.68%. This indicates that TSYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSYY	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	2.68%	+2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.69%	9.85%	+9.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.77%	12.98%	+18.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.52%	17.07%	+20.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.52%	17.07%	+20.45%

TSYY vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSYY vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 282.79%, more than QQQI's 13.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.19%	13.82%	12.85%
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF	282.79%	256.64%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSYY and QQQI in my portfolio?

TSYY and QQQI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSYY or QQQI?

TSYY has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to QQQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, TSYY or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 30.41% vs -12.29% for TSYY. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSYY or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 30.41% return vs -12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSYY or QQQI?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSYY or QQQI?

TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 13.19% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between TSYY and QQQI?

TSYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYY and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.