PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSYY vs. AMDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSYY vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -23.02% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 232.67% return.


TSYY

1D
0.67%
1M
-6.99%
6M
-22.45%
YTD
-23.02%
1Y
-9.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-25.20%

AMDL

1D
-3.34%
1M
-20.60%
6M
179.62%
YTD
232.67%
1Y
325.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$184.60M$207.34M$361.62M
$760.06K$828.41K$1.81M

TSYY vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
-23.02%-15.96%-3.30%
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
232.67%103.00%-7.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TSYY and AMDL is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSYY vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSYY
TSYY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TSYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSYY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TSYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSYY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSYY vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSYYAMDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.35

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

5.44

-5.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

10.24

-10.94

TSYY vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSYY and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSYY vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and AMDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSYYAMDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.66%

-88.63%

+45.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.02%

-56.13%

+23.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.57%

-37.49%

-4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.05%

-46.51%

+19.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.04%

29.74%

-11.70%

Volatility

TSYY vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) is 6.96%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 48.46%. This indicates that TSYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSYYAMDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

48.46%

-41.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.02%

112.40%

-95.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.54%

142.48%

-112.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.41%

120.98%

-84.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.41%

120.98%

-84.57%

TSYY vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDL's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSYY vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 256.16%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
246.79%256.64%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSYY and AMDL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDL has higher volatility (48.46%) compared to TSYY (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -42.66% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 325.41% vs -9.90% for TSYY. On fees, AMDL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 325.41% return vs -9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMDL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.

TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 246.79%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

TSYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSYY and 1.07% for AMDL.

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSYY and AMDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer