TSYW vs. PFFL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) and PFFL (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYW is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PFFL is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Preferred Stock ETF Index. TSYW is actively managed, while PFFL is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSYW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PFFL.

Performance

TSYW vs. PFFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN (PFFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSYW achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than PFFL's 0.10% return.

TSYW

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: -2.14%
• 6M: -4.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PFFL

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 0.21%
• 1Y: 8.48%
• 3Y*: 3.14%
• 5Y*: -5.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSYW vs. PFFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF	-2.14%	-2.56%
PFFL ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN	0.10%	0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TSYW and PFFL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

TSYW vs. PFFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFL

PFFL Risk / Return Rank: 17
PFFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PFFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
PFFL Omega Ratio Rank: 17
PFFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
PFFL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSYW vs. PFFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN (PFFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSYW	PFFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.78	-0.07	-0.71

Drawdowns

TSYW vs. PFFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSYW drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum PFFL drawdown of -80.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYW and PFFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSYW	PFFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-80.68%	+70.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.51%	-38.34%	+31.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-28.54%	+24.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSYW	PFFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.78%	16.91%	-6.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.78%	23.62%	-12.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.78%	55.35%	-44.57%

TSYW vs. PFFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSYW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSYW vs. PFFL - Dividend Comparison

TSYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, less than PFFL's 12.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PFFL ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN	12.44%	13.27%	13.76%	13.71%	13.90%	8.82%	9.75%	11.21%	2.02%
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF	7.44%	1.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSYW and PFFL in my portfolio?

TSYW and PFFL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSYW or PFFL?

On fees, PFFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSYW or PFFL?

PFFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSYW or PFFL?

PFFL has the higher dividend yield at 12.44%, compared with 7.44% for TSYW.

What is the main difference between TSYW and PFFL?

TSYW is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while PFFL is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYW and 0.85% for PFFL.