PFFL vs. STLG
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG).
PFFL and STLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFFL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive Preferred Stock ETF Index (+200%). It was launched on Sep 25, 2018. STLG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2020. Both PFFL and STLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PFFL or STLG.
Key characteristics
| PFFL | STLG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.32% | 36.89% |
| 1Y Return | 34.50% | 48.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.60% | 12.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.56 | 2.77 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.17 | 3.55 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.65 | 3.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.85 | 14.27 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.17% | 3.51% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.91% | 18.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -80.68% | -31.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -33.06% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFL and STLG is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PFFL vs. STLG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PFFL achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than STLG's 36.89% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFFL vs. STLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than STLG's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PFFL vs. STLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PFFL vs. STLG - Dividend Comparison
PFFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.54%, more than STLG's 0.31% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFL ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN | 10.54% | 13.72% | 13.91% | 8.81% | 9.76% | 12.04% | 2.02% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.31% | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PFFL vs. STLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFL drawdown since its inception was -80.68%, which is greater than STLG's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFL and STLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PFFL vs. STLG - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) have volatilities of 5.95% and 5.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.