PFFL vs. PFFD
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD).
PFFL and PFFD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFFL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive Preferred Stock ETF Index (+200%). It was launched on Sep 25, 2018. PFFD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. It was launched on Sep 11, 2017. Both PFFL and PFFD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PFFL or PFFD.
Correlation
The correlation between PFFL and PFFD is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PFFL vs. PFFD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PFFL:
0.24
PFFD:
0.82
PFFL:
0.47
PFFD:
1.17
PFFL:
1.06
PFFD:
1.15
PFFL:
0.12
PFFD:
0.46
PFFL:
1.01
PFFD:
3.62
PFFL:
5.06%
PFFD:
1.89%
PFFL:
21.01%
PFFD:
8.39%
PFFL:
-80.68%
PFFD:
-30.93%
PFFL:
-39.32%
PFFD:
-8.41%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFL achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than PFFD's 7.49% return.
PFFL
5.42%
-6.30%
2.01%
5.24%
-8.72%
N/A
PFFD
7.49%
-2.75%
2.83%
6.80%
0.96%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFFL vs. PFFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PFFL vs. PFFD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PFFL vs. PFFD - Dividend Comparison
PFFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.69%, more than PFFD's 6.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFL ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN | 13.69% | 13.72% | 13.91% | 8.81% | 9.76% | 12.04% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 6.38% | 6.49% | 6.63% | 5.09% | 5.19% | 5.49% | 6.22% | 1.94% |
Drawdowns
PFFL vs. PFFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFL drawdown since its inception was -80.68%, which is greater than PFFD's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFL and PFFD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PFFL vs. PFFD - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) at 2.25%. This indicates that PFFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.