PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSPX vs. EAOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSPX vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSPX achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than EAOA's 10.26% return.


TSPX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.65%
YTD
8.52%
6M
8.92%
1Y
21.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EAOA

1D
0.30%
1M
3.78%
YTD
10.26%
6M
10.73%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSPX vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSPX and EAOA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025

0.93

The correlation between TSPX and EAOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSPX vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSPX
TSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSPX vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSPXEAOADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.99

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.91

13.28

+1.62

TSPX vs. EAOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the EAOA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSPX and EAOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSPXEAOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.28

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

0.93

+0.86

Drawdowns

TSPX vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSPX drawdown since its inception was -7.80%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPX and EAOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSPXEAOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-25.06%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-8.17%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.41%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-5.31%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.84%

-0.38%

Volatility

TSPX vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) is 2.25%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that TSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSPXEAOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

3.33%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.08%

8.65%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.12%

10.75%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.78%

13.24%

-2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

13.14%

-2.36%

TSPX vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSPX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSPX vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

TSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than EAOA's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
1.95%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%
TSPX
Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
1.98%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TSPX and EAOA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EAOA has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to TSPX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPX dropped -7.80% vs EAOA's -25.06%.

On 1-year performance, EAOA leads with 24.34% vs 21.64% for TSPX. On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TSPX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 24.34% return vs 21.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TSPX.

TSPX has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.

They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TSPX and 0.18% for EAOA.

TSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSPX and EAOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer