PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSNF vs. ASMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSNF vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF (TSNF) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSNF achieves a 17.45% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 68.52% return.


TSNF

1D
-0.60%
1M
-9.69%
6M
4.62%
YTD
17.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASMH

1D
-1.70%
1M
-5.89%
6M
31.57%
YTD
68.52%
1Y
141.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSNF vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSNF and ASMH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSNF vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSNF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ASMH
ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSNF vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF (TSNF) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSNFASMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.84

TSNF vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSNF vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSNF drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSNF and ASMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSNFASMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-15.89%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.55%

-12.03%

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-4.43%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

Volatility

TSNF vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSNFASMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.32%

42.93%

-8.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.32%

41.24%

-6.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.32%

41.24%

-6.92%

TSNF vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSNF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSNF vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

TSNF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSNF and ASMH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSNF.

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for TSNF.

TSNF tracks Truth Social - Yorkville American Next Frontiers Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSNF and 0.19% for ASMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSNF and ASMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer