TSNF vs. CHPS

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

TSNF (Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSNF is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Truth Social - Yorkville American Next Frontiers Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSNF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

TSNF vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF (TSNF) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSNF achieves a 27.70% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 93.72% return.

TSNF

• 1D: -3.35%
• 1M: -6.52%
• 6M: 24.18%
• YTD: 27.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -6.02%
• 1M: -6.85%
• 6M: 85.72%
• YTD: 93.72%
• 1Y: 159.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSNF vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSNF Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF	27.70%	-1.68%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	93.72%	-0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TSNF and CHPS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

TSNF vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSNF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSNF vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF (TSNF) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSNF	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.87	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.53	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	32.58	—

Drawdowns

TSNF vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSNF drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSNF and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSNF	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.59%	-39.44%	+20.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.18%	-14.92%	+6.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-9.07%	+3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSNF	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	24.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.34%	41.67%	-7.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.34%	36.13%	-1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.34%	36.13%	-1.79%

TSNF vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSNF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSNF vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

TSNF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.34%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
TSNF Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSNF and CHPS in my portfolio?

TSNF and CHPS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSNF or CHPS?

On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSNF or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSNF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSNF or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for TSNF.

What is the main difference between TSNF and CHPS?

TSNF is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. TSNF tracks Truth Social - Yorkville American Next Frontiers Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSNF and 0.15% for CHPS.