TSMZ vs. MSTZ
TSMZ (Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMZ returned -48.22% vs 159.07% for MSTZ. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TSMZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
TSMZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSMZ having a -31.34% return and MSTZ slightly higher at -30.44%.
TSMZ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- 6M
- -24.87%
- YTD
- -31.34%
- 1Y
- -48.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.42%
MSTZ
- 1D
- 8.95%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- 6M
- -24.16%
- YTD
- -30.44%
- 1Y
- 159.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -86.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $101.73M | $133.33M | $177.41M | |
| $787.65K | $1.02M | $750.23K |
TSMZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | -31.34% | -41.91% | -11.25% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -30.44% | -38.95% | -90.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMZ and MSTZ is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
TSMZ
MSTZ
TSMZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.28 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 2.44 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 4.53 | -5.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.02% | -99.38% | +25.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.52% | -84.89% | +28.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.99% | -97.63% | +27.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -94.63% | +54.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.46% | 45.62% | -10.16% |
Volatility
TSMZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) is 14.51%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that TSMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.51% | 37.86% | -23.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.33% | 134.52% | -101.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.76% | 150.23% | -109.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.96% | 169.87% | -127.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.96% | 169.87% | -127.91% |
TSMZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | 4.39% | 4.88% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMZ and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to TSMZ (14.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -74.02% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 159.07% vs -48.22% for TSMZ. On fees, TSMZ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, TSMZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 159.07% return vs -48.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMZ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMZ and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer