TSMZ vs. EWT

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

TSMZ (Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSMZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while EWT is a Taiwan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index. TSMZ is actively managed, while EWT is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMZ returned -52.29% vs 90.51% for EWT. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. TSMZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.

Performance

TSMZ vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -35.32% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 67.15% return.

TSMZ

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -4.73%
• 6M: -30.97%
• YTD: -35.32%
• 1Y: -52.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EWT

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 3.48%
• 6M: 61.09%
• YTD: 67.15%
• 1Y: 90.51%
• 3Y*: 40.13%
• 5Y*: 18.88%
• 10Y*: 19.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMZ vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares	-35.32%	-41.91%	-11.25%
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	67.15%	28.38%	-0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMZ and EWT is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.76

The correlation between TSMZ and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.77 to -0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSMZ vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMZ

TSMZ Risk / Return Rank: 1
TSMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TSMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

EWT

EWT Risk / Return Rank: 95
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMZ vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSMZ	EWT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.34	3.18	-4.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.19	3.62	-5.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.52	-0.76
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	8.63	-9.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.57	23.96	-25.53

TSMZ vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.34, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMZ and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSMZ vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, which is greater than EWT's maximum drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and EWT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMZ	EWT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.02%	-64.37%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.52%	-10.51%	-46.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.88%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.73%	-4.79%	-66.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.59%	-19.11%	-20.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.35%	3.78%	+29.57%

Volatility

TSMZ vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) has a higher volatility of 17.38% compared to iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) at 13.31%. This indicates that TSMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSMZ	EWT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.38%	13.31%	+4.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.71%	25.16%	+6.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.31%	28.57%	+10.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.59%	23.40%	+18.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.59%	21.90%	+19.69%

TSMZ vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMZ vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than EWT's 2.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	2.65%	4.43%	3.32%	12.01%	18.82%	0.55%	1.83%	2.49%	3.16%	2.81%	2.39%	3.12%
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares	4.66%	4.88%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMZ and EWT in my portfolio?

TSMZ and EWT have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSMZ or EWT?

TSMZ has higher volatility (17.38%) compared to EWT (13.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -74.02% vs EWT's -64.37%.

Which ETF is better, TSMZ or EWT?

On 1-year performance, EWT leads with 90.51% vs -52.29% for TSMZ. On fees, EWT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EWT has been the lower-risk option at 13.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSMZ or EWT?

Over the 1-year period, EWT has performed better with a 90.51% return vs -52.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMZ or EWT?

EWT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMZ or EWT?

TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 2.65% for EWT.

What is the main difference between TSMZ and EWT?

TSMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EWT is Taiwan Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 0.59% for EWT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.