TSMU vs. AMDL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TSMU (GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMU returned 224.68% vs 835.61% for AMDL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSMU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

TSMU vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMU achieves a 76.82% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 330.80% return.

TSMU

• 1D: -13.58%
• 1M: 12.60%
• YTD: 76.82%
• 6M: 84.23%
• 1Y: 224.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: -11.53%
• 1M: 15.74%
• YTD: 330.80%
• 6M: 327.23%
• 1Y: 835.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMU vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	76.82%	74.83%	3.55%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	330.80%	103.00%	-34.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMU and AMDL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024	0.58

The correlation between TSMU and AMDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSMU vs. AMDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSMU	AMDL
Technology	66.6%	66.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TSMU vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMU

TSMU Risk / Return Rank: 84
TSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
TSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
TSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMU vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSMU	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	6.28	-3.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	4.08	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.53	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.43	15.04	-8.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.44	29.24	-8.80

TSMU vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 6.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMU and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSMU vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMU	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.73%	-88.63%	+24.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.18%	-56.13%	+20.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.58%	-13.00%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.71%	-47.74%	+32.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.05%	28.81%	-17.76%

Volatility

TSMU vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) is 32.59%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 48.98%. This indicates that TSMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSMU	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.59%	48.98%	-16.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.71%	102.19%	-42.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.25%	134.44%	-58.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.32%	118.50%	-36.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.32%	118.50%	-36.18%

TSMU vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMU vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSMU nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMU and AMDL in my portfolio?

TSMU and AMDL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSMU or AMDL?

AMDL has higher volatility (48.98%) compared to TSMU (32.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMU dropped -63.73% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

Which ETF is better, TSMU or AMDL?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 835.61% vs 224.68% for TSMU. On fees, AMDL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, TSMU has been the lower-risk option at 32.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSMU or AMDL?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 835.61% return vs 224.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMU or AMDL?

AMDL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMU or AMDL?

TSMU and AMDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TSMU and AMDL?

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSMU and 1.15% for AMDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.28 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.