TSLZ vs. TTDU
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TTDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. TSLZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TTDU.
Performance
TSLZ vs. TTDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a -5.60% return, which is significantly higher than TTDU's -76.26% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -16.90%
- 1Y
- -64.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTDU
- 1D
- -18.25%
- 1M
- -28.39%
- YTD
- -76.26%
- 6M
- -79.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ vs. TTDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.60% | -25.14% |
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -76.26% | -37.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and TTDU is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. TTDU — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
TTDU
TSLZ vs. TTDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLZ | TTDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLZ | TTDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.87 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. TTDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than TTDU's maximum drawdown of -89.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and TTDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | TTDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -89.64% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.01% | -89.31% | -9.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -59.05% | -16.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.42% | — | — |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. TTDU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | TTDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.67% | 108.04% | -16.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 108.04% | +9.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 108.04% | +9.09% |
TSLZ vs. TTDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TTDU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. TTDU - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while TTDU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and TTDU have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for TTDU.
TSLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TTDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 1.50% for TTDU.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and TTDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer