PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLZ vs. TSLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLZ vs. TSLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a -5.60% return, which is significantly higher than TSLT's -21.75% return.


TSLZ

1D
-3.70%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-5.60%
6M
-16.90%
1Y
-64.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLT

1D
3.83%
1M
14.40%
YTD
-21.75%
6M
-16.23%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLZ vs. TSLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
-5.60%-75.98%-88.79%-28.07%
TSLT
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF
-21.75%-29.49%54.17%20.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLZ and TSLT is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

-1.00

The correlation between TSLZ and TSLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLZ vs. TSLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLT
TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLZ vs. TSLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLZTSLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.71

0.05

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.96

0.74

-1.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.09

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

0.06

-0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.06

0.12

-1.17

TSLZ vs. TSLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the TSLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLZ and TSLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLZTSLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

0.05

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

0.01

-0.68

Drawdowns

TSLZ vs. TSLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than TSLT's maximum drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and TSLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLZTSLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-83.16%

-15.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.62%

-55.08%

-21.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.01%

-61.99%

-37.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.32%

-50.22%

-25.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.42%

26.98%

+33.44%

Volatility

TSLZ vs. TSLT - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) have volatilities of 24.08% and 24.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLZTSLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.08%

24.38%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.94%

54.35%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.67%

92.42%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.13%

117.14%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.13%

117.14%

-0.01%

TSLZ vs. TSLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSLZ and TSLT have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Dividends

TSLZ vs. TSLT - Dividend Comparison

TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSLT
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.73%0.69%2.08%12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLZ and TSLT have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLT has higher volatility (24.38%) compared to TSLZ (24.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs TSLT's -83.16%.

On 1-year performance, TSLT leads with 4.97% vs -64.61% for TSLZ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 24.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLT has performed better with a 4.97% return vs -64.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLZ and TSLT have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.

TSLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TSLT is Leveraged Equities.

TSLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLZ and TSLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer