TSLZ vs. MSTZ
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -64.61% vs 56.67% for MSTZ. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a -5.60% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -53.41% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -16.90%
- 1Y
- -64.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 18.20%
- 1M
- 51.33%
- YTD
- -53.41%
- 6M
- -37.72%
- 1Y
- 56.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.60% | -75.98% | -81.82% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -53.41% | -38.95% | -94.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and MSTZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
MSTZ
TSLZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | 0.41 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | 1.52 | -2.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.19 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 0.64 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 1.35 | -2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 0.41 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.54 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -99.36% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -84.89% | +8.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.01% | -98.37% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -94.38% | +19.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.42% | 40.08% | +20.34% |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) is 24.08%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.37%. This indicates that TSLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 37.37% | -13.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.94% | 125.27% | -70.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.67% | 139.71% | -48.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 170.21% | -53.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 170.21% | -53.08% |
TSLZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLZ and MSTZ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.37%) compared to TSLZ (24.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs MSTZ's -99.36%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 56.67% vs -64.61% for TSLZ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 24.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 56.67% return vs -64.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLZ and MSTZ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and REX.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer