TSLZ vs. MSFX
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while MSFX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -48.25% vs -36.75% for MSFX. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLZ vs. MSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a 45.39% return, which is significantly higher than MSFX's -19.85% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 44.35%
- 6M
- 37.89%
- YTD
- 45.39%
- 1Y
- -48.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -71.84%
MSFX
- 1D
- 5.74%
- 1M
- 37.34%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- -19.85%
- 1Y
- -36.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.46M | $6.03M | $5.49M | |
| $39.89M | $35.72M | $42.79M |
TSLZ vs. MSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 45.39% | -75.98% | -90.03% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -19.85% | 9.84% | 3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and MSFX is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | -0.32 |
The correlation between TSLZ and MSFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (all time) to -0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. MSFX — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
MSFX
TSLZ vs. MSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLZ | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.91 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.62 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | -1.01 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. MSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than MSFX's maximum drawdown of -63.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and MSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -63.56% | -35.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.73% | -63.56% | -6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.47% | -39.33% | -59.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.60% | -23.33% | -53.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.63% | 38.70% | +17.93% |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. MSFX - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 37.13% compared to T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) at 29.51%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.13% | 29.51% | +7.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.39% | 51.35% | +16.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.79% | 63.33% | +28.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.68% | 53.73% | +63.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.68% | 53.73% | +63.95% |
TSLZ vs. MSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLZ and MSFX have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. MSFX - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than MSFX's 6.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 6.66% | 5.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.47% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and MSFX have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (37.13%) compared to MSFX (29.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs MSFX's -63.56%.
On 1-year performance, MSFX leads with -36.75% vs -48.25% for TSLZ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MSFX has been the lower-risk option at 29.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSFX has performed better with a -36.75% return vs -48.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLZ and MSFX have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 0.47% for TSLZ.
TSLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MSFX is Leveraged Equities.
TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and MSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer