TSLZ vs. HLAL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while HLAL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FTSE Shariah USA Index. TSLZ is actively managed, while HLAL is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -61.70% vs 32.36% for HLAL. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. TSLZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.

Performance

TSLZ vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 14.76% return.

TSLZ

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -1.18%
• 6M: -4.71%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 1Y: -61.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HLAL

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: 13.39%
• YTD: 14.76%
• 1Y: 32.36%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 14.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLZ vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	-1.05%	-75.98%	-88.79%	-24.75%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	14.76%	18.30%	16.70%	8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLZ and HLAL is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	-0.61

The correlation between TSLZ and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.64 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSLZ vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLZ

TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 82
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 82
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLZ vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLZ	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	2.20	-2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.89	3.03	-3.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.38	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	3.19	-4.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.11	12.71	-13.82

TSLZ vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the HLAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLZ and HLAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLZ vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and HLAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLZ	HLAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.11%	-33.57%	-65.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.73%	-10.20%	-59.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.96%	-3.40%	-95.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-76.25%	-4.98%	-71.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.55%	2.55%	+53.00%

Volatility

TSLZ vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 33.89% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 5.25%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLZ	HLAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.89%	5.25%	+28.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.74%	12.17%	+50.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.14%	14.77%	+73.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	116.91%	17.86%	+99.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	116.91%	20.23%	+96.68%

TSLZ vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLZ vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than HLAL's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.45%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.69%	0.69%	2.08%	12.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLZ and HLAL in my portfolio?

TSLZ and HLAL have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLZ or HLAL?

TSLZ has higher volatility (33.89%) compared to HLAL (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs HLAL's -33.57%.

Which ETF is better, TSLZ or HLAL?

On 1-year performance, HLAL leads with 32.36% vs -61.70% for TSLZ. On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLZ or HLAL?

Over the 1-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 32.36% return vs -61.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLZ or HLAL?

HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLZ or HLAL?

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.45% for HLAL.

What is the main difference between TSLZ and HLAL?

TSLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while HLAL is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 0.50% for HLAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.